PhilArchive
open access
Data and the Good?
Surveillance studies scholars and privacy scholars have each developed sophisticated, important critiques of the existing data-driven order. But too few scholars in either tradition have put forward alternative substantive conceptions of a good digital society. This, I argue, is a crucial omission. Unless we construct new “sociotechnical imaginaries,” new understandings of the goals and aspirations digital technologies should aim to achieve, the most surveillance studies and privacy scholars can hope to accomplish is a less unjust version of the technology industry’s own vision for the future.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- PRIVACY AND DIGITAL SURVEILLANCE IN CONTEMPORARY CONFLICTS: ASSESSING THE LEGALITY OF MASS DATA COLLECTION UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAW#1177478
- DATA SECRECY AND TEST DATA PROTECTION LAW: DRIVING ON A HALF-BUILT HIGHWAY#1177009
- Conceptions of data protection and privacy: legal and philosophical perspectives#1177370
- The ethical imperatives of the COVID 19 pandemic: a review from data ethics#703633
- Privacy in the face of new technologies of surveillance#773931
Record · ID 107695
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive