arXiv (All)
open access
Complementary Information Sources
A decision maker may have several information sources available and choose which one to consult only after learning the decision problem she faces. When is one such set of sources uniformly more valuable than another? For unrestricted Bayesian decision problems, we show that the answer can be stated
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- A comparison of imprecise Bayesianism and Dempster–Shafer theory for automated decisions under ambiguity#75774
- Distinction between Beliefs and Desires#750786
- Probabilistic empiricism#96329
- Introduction of Over/Under/Off Masses#83129
- Statistical inference of additive monotone models and instance-optimality of multi-armed bandits and reinforcement learning#206992
Record · ID 1076995
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive