arXiv (All)
open access
Sharp Limits for Honest Uncertainty in Hard-Budget Repeated Evaluation
Repeated evaluation can estimate a benchmark score accurately while still requiring replication to certify narrow uncertainty. We characterize that requirement on a fixed grid of $M$ tasks with $L$ binary paths per task under the hard budget $(M+t)K$, where each path costs at most $K$ responses or e
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Robustness Analysis of Agentic AI to Inconsistent and Incomplete Tool Responses#793895
- Robustness Analysis of Agentic AI to Inconsistent and Incomplete Tool Responses#789876
- Cheap Verifiers, Large Blind Spots: Measuring the Reliability Cost of Cost-Saving Cascades#971883
- DualStake: Dual-Path Confidence Calibration in Deep Research Agents#820932
- FLOPs vs Real Work: The Importance of Replication in AI Efficiency Assessment#610053
Record · ID 1077069
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive