arXiv (All)
open access
When No One Owns the Judgment: Accountability Under Contribution Dissolution in Human-AI Collaboration
Communities often respond to potentially AI-assisted work by asking three questions: Was AI used? Was that use disclosed? Can hidden use be detected? These questions place AI use itself at the center of accountability while overlooking a deeper problem: unowned judgment. Evaluations, claims, decisio
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Confronting Empty Humanism in AI Policy#1075893
- The LOGOS Framework: A Five-Level Taxonomy of Human Cognitive Agency in AI-Assisted Assessment#197051
- Learning for Agency: What AI Demands of Education#276778
- Detecting Consciousness and Granting Rights: A Comprehensive Framework for Ethical AI Development#118165
- Beyond Fact-checking: Teaching a Layered Framework for Critical Assessment of AI-Generated Information Through the Lens of Public Health Debates#450624
Record · ID 1077241
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive