arXiv (All)
open access
Beloved Afterlives: Governing AI Resurrection Beyond Consent
AI resurrection is often framed as a question of consent: did the represented person authorize being made to speak? That question matters, but it freezes authority at the moment of creation. A representation can later change models, pass to relatives, depend on a provider, incorporate records shared
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Transformative Potential of AI in Healthcare: Definitions, Applications, and Navigating the Ethical Landscape and Public Perspectives#199616
- Navigating the Digital Age: Smart AI Ethics for Seamless Transformation#79284
- The Retrospective Illusion of Origin – Order as Post-Nomination#102889
- Becoming, Resonance, Responsibility: Toward a Philosophy of Continuity#707429
- Why Philosophy Matters for AI: Executable Metaphysics, Tonal Sovereignty, and the Ethics of Generative Speech#713927
Record · ID 1077472
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive