arXiv (All)
open access
Is Reasoning Always Useful? Rethinking Reasoning Utility in Universal Multimodal Embeddings
Reasoning-enhanced universal multimodal embeddings (UME) improve heterogeneous retrieval, but plausible rationales do not necessarily produce discriminative rankings. We study this gap by comparing the discriminative (DISC) and reasoning-driven generative (GEN) branches of UME-R1, a state-of-the-art
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Learning Multimodal Embeddings with Evidence-Aligned Readout#1118732
- VaME: Exploring Variational Latent Reasoning for Multimodal Embeddings#1118114
- MMGR: Multi-Modal Generative Reasoning Benchmark and Evaluation#999700
- MMLongEmbed: Benchmarking Multimodal Embedding Models in Long-Context Scenarios#798963
- DualG-MRAG: Decoupling Macro-Reasoning and Micro-Matching for Multimodal Retrieval-Augmented Generation#414133
Record · ID 1077488
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive