arXiv (All)
open access
Learning to Ideate for Scientific Impact
Scientific ideation is increasingly mediated by large language models, but current ideation systems are usually trained and evaluated on immediately judgeable proxies such as novelty, clarity, and feasibility. This leaves open whether delayed signals of scientific uptake can be used as feedback for
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- CWF: A Collaborative Writing Framework for Personalized and Reliable Popular Science Writing#973732
- Metacognitive Steering: Learning the Structure of Scientific Judgment#1110618
- Length Penalties Make Chain-of-Thought Less Monitorable#1050911
- Causal Reasoning and Large Language Models: Opening a New Frontier for Causality#16644
- Speaking the Language of Science: Toward a General-Purpose Generative Foundation Model for the Natural Sciences#292670
Record · ID 1077729
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive