arXiv (All)
open access
Fair Feed Ranking for Participatory Budgeting
In large-scale participatory budgeting, citizens cannot inspect the full proposal pool, so the order in which proposals are shown becomes a form of agenda-setting power. We argue that fair exposure should therefore be treated as a democratic-design goal. We study Consul Democracy, a widely deployed
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Participatory Practices in Policy-Making: Negotiating Democratic Outcomes or Manoeuvring for Compliance?#460495
- Public behavioral compliance challenges in household medical waste management: an evolutionary game perspective on policy.#146048
- Translating community-based participatory research into broadscale sociopolitical change: insights from a coalition of women firefighters, scientists, and environmental health advocates#634717
- Public voices matter - an analysis of public participation and the role of legislators in Kenya#956961
- 31 CFR Part 13 — Procedures for Providing Assistance to State and Local Governments in Protecting Foreign Diplomatic Missions#508315
Record · ID 1077746
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive