arXiv (All)
open access
Classical AI vs. LLMs for Decision-Maker Alignment in Health Insurance Choices
As algorithmic decision-makers are increasingly applied to high-stakes domains, AI alignment research has evolved from a focus on universal value alignment to context-specific approaches that account for decision-maker attributes. Prior work on Decision-Maker Alignment (DMA) has explored two primary
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- AI Driven Contribution Value System#94944
- Αn empirical study to measure the use and impact of an imprecise information approach in the decision support system Entscheidungsnavi / Mendy Tönsfeuerborn, Rüdiger von Nitzsch#780384
- Context, Reasoning, and Hierarchy: A Cost-Performance Study of Compound LLM Agent Design in an Adversarial POMDP#192386
- AI-Native Insurance for Agentic AI: Pricing, Underwriting, and End-to-End Automation#370293
- AI-Driven Enterprise Architecture and Value Realization Framework#183487
Record · ID 1077852
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive