arXiv (All)
open access
Safety Under Scaffolding: How Evaluation Conditions Shape Measured Safety
Safety benchmarks usually test "bare" models that receive prompts and output responses, but real-world deployments "wrap" those models in complex scaffolds. How much do these scaffolds affect model safety as measured by benchmarks? We test six leading models on four pre-registered safety benchmarks
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- SafeTutors: Benchmarking Pedagogical Safety in AI Tutoring Systems#1064893
- Reliability and Safety Assessment for Safety Critical Systems : Select Proceedings of NCRS 2025 / edited by Alpana Goel, Archana Yadav, P. V. Varde#1165576
- JTA: Joint Testability Architecture for Scenario-Based Validation of Safety-Critical Software#432605
- A Safe Prototype Is Not a Safety Direction: Reference Dependence and Prompt Confounds in Response-Safety Embeddings#1160927
- A Safe Prototype Is Not a Safety Direction: Reference Dependence and Prompt Confounds in Response-Safety Embeddings#1157072
Record · ID 1077870
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive