arXiv (All)
open access
How does Adversarial Influence Scale in Multi-Agent Systems?
Multi-agent deliberation can improve performance, but what happens when some agents do not act in good faith? In practice, an agent may be deceptive and work to subvert the group, whether through its own objectives or external instruction. We study how susceptibility to deception scales as groups in
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Diversity, Trust, and Conformity: A Simulation Study#731635
- Conceptual Art, Social Psychology, And Deception#736853
- AgentTrap: Measuring Runtime Trust Failures in Third-Party Agent Skills#187269
- Trust as a Public Virtue#775965
- Composing Task-specific Agent Harnesses at Test Time with Reusable Primitives#1143513
Record · ID 1078099
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive