eScholarship
metadata only
Animals don’t count: Clearing up confusion on subitizing
This paper aims to clear up terminological confusion in the study of numerical cognition, regarding subitizing (Kaufman, Lord, Reese, & Volkmann, 1949). While the term ‘subitizing’ was originally coined to describe the behaviour of numerate humans, it has since been applied to preverbal infants
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- From Maximal Intersubjectivity to Objectivity: An Argument from the Development of Arithmetical Cognition#713933
- Perceptual variation in object perception: A defence of perceptual pluralism#95571
- Proceedings of the 2009 Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society#107159
- Mathematics as Cognitive Formalization: An Epistemological Account of Its Scientific Effectiveness#718538
- The Harder Problem of Consciousness#100921
Record · ID 1078924
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive