eScholarship
metadata only
Why Bayesians Polarize: Towards A Unified Account
It is widely assumed that when belief polarization occurs – people updating their beliefs in opposing directions in response to the same evidence – people’s reasoning must be in some way irrational. Yet, several authors have shown that Bayesian reasoning can, theoretically, cause polarization. I pro
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Performative Contingency and Affective Polarization#382258
- Unravelling the Tangled Web: Continuity, Internalism, Non-Uniqueness and Self-Locating Beliefs#752575
- Phenomenal conservatism and evidentialism in religious epistemology#100925
- Uma Abordagem Bayesiana ao Paradoxo do Prefácio#71742
- Understanding Polarization: Meaning, Measures, and Model Evaluation#702906
Record · ID 1078935
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive