eScholarship
metadata only
Which Words are Most Iconic, and Which are Rated Most Consistently? A Large-Scale Analysis of Human Iconicity Ratings with Imputed Predictors
Iconicity is a central notion in cognitive science, attracting growing attention from perspectives on language acquisition, processing, and language evolution. While previous research has emphasized the subjective nature of iconicity, quantitative analyses of iconicity ratings have relied primarily
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Evaluating Steering Techniques using Human Similarity Judgments#972377
- If a Picture is Worth 1000 Words, Is a Word Worth 1000 Features for Design Metric Estimation?#315265
- NumerosityVLM: A Cognitively Inspired Benchmark for Interpreting Numerosity Representations in Vision-Language Models#616592
- NumerosityVLM: A Cognitively Inspired Benchmark for Interpreting Numerosity Representations in Vision-Language Models#616092
- Attention Mean Fields Predict Average Representation Dynamics and Reveal Context-Specific Computation#1110743
Record · ID 1078969
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive