eScholarship
metadata only
Balancing Competing Goals when Coordinating over Rule Construction
Even competitive activities require cooperation to agree on the rules. How do people navigate this tension, and what conditions help them reach agreement? We study rule negotiation in a collaborative game design task (N = 184) where dyads propose and vote on what game to play, crossing two factors
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Pragmatic Reasoning in Design#1078920
- Knowing What Others Know: Coordination Motives in Information Acquisition#942153
- Team reasoning and a measure of mutual advantage in games#743970
- Salience reasoning in coordination games#766363
- Team Reasoning as a Guide to Coordination#746994
Record · ID 1078984
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive