eScholarship
metadata only
What Drives Learning During Practice and Testing? Evidence for Distinct Roles of Exposure and Retrieval
Practice improves learning, yet it remains unclear which learning mechanism drives memory change across practice and testing. Competing theories attribute learning to repeated exposure, error correction, or successful retrieval, but these mechanisms are rarely evaluated in direct competition with on
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Potentiating effects of interim tests and metacognitive judgments on future learning#310044
- The effect of divided attention on false memory depends on how memory is tested.#275080
- Auditing psychological inferences about memory from adaptive learning logs: Cognitive-model recovery, policy logging, and randomized validation#444316
- The Effects of Differential Exposure to Learning Trials on Maintenance of Behavior Analytic Terminology#383718
- Memory and Causation#170066
Record · ID 1079009
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive