eScholarship
metadata only
Exploring self-biases in reference games
Classic tasks of pragmatic reasoning involve inferring a possible referent given a speaker’s utterance (Frank & Goodman, 2012). Given prior work demonstrating self-favoring biases in perception and causal attribution, we investigated whether listeners show biased pragmatic reasoning when the ref
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- TRACE: Transparent Retrieval for Abstract Concept Evaluation#1062070
- Syntactic Prominence and Pragmatic Bias in Turkish Subject Anaphora: Humans and Large Language Models#1089861
- The talking heads attentional bias assessment task: A readily available, reliable, and effective task for assessing attentional bias.#222824
- Which one is banana man? Evaluating vision-language models in multi-turn pragmatic interpretation#798213
- Which one is banana man? Evaluating vision-language models in multi-turn pragmatic interpretation#796800
Record · ID 1079017
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive