eScholarship
metadata only
Why retracted articles can have an influential afterlife—and what to do about it
Retractions of published journal articles are an increasingly common means by which the research community ensures the quality and integrity of publications and addresses research misconduct missed during pre-publication peer review. Retractions are intended to notify the public of issues that under
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Transparency in the retraction process The honesty and self-correction spirit of scientists#696669
- Tracking the Data Quality Landscape of Retracted Papers: Flag Usage in Titles and Changes in DOI Retraction Status#818644
- The Revision Theory of Resurrection#770988
- Addressing the Continued Circulation of Retracted Research as a Design Problem#78949
- Should scientific papers with no clear factual errors or associated research misconduct be editorially retracted based solely on irreproducibility?#622132
Record · ID 1079040
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive