PsyArXiv
metadata only
Core perception needs substance, not boundaries
Core perception: re-imagining precocious reasoning as sophisticated perceiving sets out an impressive agenda that Spelke’s core knowledge theory is more appropriately called core perception. We raise two questions about this argument. First, why impose a distinct boundary between perception and cogn
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Bodily Core Knowledge#79296
- Perceptual Content and the Unity of Perception#100724
- Perceiving and Thinking: Inquiry into Two Types of Phenomenology#115210
- "Perception as Controlled Hallucination": From Neurocentrism to Action-Perception Coupling#97060
- The Perception-Cognition Border: Architecture or Format?#85057
Record · ID 1081566
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive