SocArXiv
metadata only
Are geographical and socioeconomic contexts exchangeable? On simple means versus random effects in the study of health inequalities
Multilevel random-effects (RE) models are standard in social and geographical epidemiology. They rest on the assumption of exchangeability, which means that, before seeing the data, we have no reason to distinguish one group from another: group means become draws from one common distribution. RE mod
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Are geographical and socioeconomic contexts exchangeable? On simple means versus random effects in the study of health inequalities#928547
- Are geographical and socioeconomic contexts exchangeable? On simple means versus random effects in the study of health inequalities#928079
- Fixed-Population Causal Inference for Models of Equilibrium#996862
- Does the health system model shape prevention? Evidence from 22 OECD countries (2004-2023)#344736
- Does the Health System Model Shape Prevention? Evidence from 22 OECD Countries (2004-2023)#130538
Record · ID 1081992
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive