arXiv (OAI Expanded)
open access
When the Canonical Completion Is Wrong: Formalizing and Measuring the Jump in Large Language Models
Whether large language models (LLMs) can perform the abductive leap from evidence to a new system of axioms, commonly referred to as a jump, has recently attracted considerable debate. A prominent position holds that LLMs are structurally incapable of such jumps, while recent studies challenge both
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Human-Anchored Inference for Ranking New Models with Large Language Model Judges#1014189
- Do Language Models Follow Occam's Razor? An Evaluation of Parsimony in Inductive and Abductive Reasoning#677416
- Do Language Models Follow Occam's Razor? An Evaluation of Parsimony in Inductive and Abductive Reasoning#674219
- Large Language Models are not a One-Size-Fit All Solution for Archives and Records Management#983980
- The Systems of Relevance Logic#754104
Record · ID 1083177
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive