arXiv (OAI Expanded)
open access
Characterizing (Co)Free Dagger Categories
For any category, there exists both a free dagger category and a cofree dagger category over it. A natural question to ask is: given a dagger category, how can we tell if it is free or cofree without specifying an external base category? In this paper, we provide characterizations of both free dagge
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Modular data of non-semisimple modular categories#1142517
- Modular $\mathbb{Z}_2$-Crossed Tambara-Yamagami-like Categories for Even Groups#609761
- Algebraic presentation of the bordism category of 2-dimensional CW-complexes#1000443
- New model category structures for algebraic quantum field theory#498753
- Derived Smooth and Banach Higher Groupoids: Representability and Descent#1064764
Record · ID 1083739
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive