arXiv (OAI Expanded)
open access
Policy Loopholes in Agent Evaluation: When Policy Ambiguity Masquerades as Agent Error
Agent benchmarks evaluate policy compliance but assume each policy determines a unique correct action. Natural-language policies can violate this assumption through silence, ambiguity, or contradiction, admitting multiple defensible readings that a single gold trajectory cannot capture. Auditing two
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Policy-Invisible Violations in LLM-Based Agents#13033
- Sensitivity Meets Explanation: An Improved Counterfactual Condition on Knowledge#755717
- Under the Hood of SKILL.md: Semantic Supply-chain Attacks on AI Agent Skill Registry#178820
- A Framework for Evaluating Agentic Skills at Scale#282849
- When it is Not Logically Necessary for a Necessary Condition of Value to be Valuable#746113
Record · ID 1083839
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive