arXiv (OAI Expanded)
open access
Are explainable AI (XAI) evaluation strategies aligned? Comparing subjective, objective, and mathematical evaluation measures using saliency maps
The evaluation of explainable AI (XAI) approaches often relies on three families of methods: subjective measures (e.g., questionnaires on trust or satisfaction), objective measures (e.g., task performance metrics), and mathematical metrics (e.g., for faithfulness). Yet, it remains unclear how these
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Attention and perceptual justification#767792
- Learn to Rank: Visual Attribution by Learning Importance Ranking#973121
- A three-dimensional typology of agency for advanced AI systems#471290
- L'influence de l'agentivité sur le traitement sensoriel : le rôle des prédictions et de l'attention dans la perception visuelle#317448
- EgoTSR++: Egocentric Spatiotemporal Reasoning for Task Progress Understanding#1115707
Record · ID 1084006
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive