arXiv (OAI Expanded)
open access
The Missing Boundary: How Autonomous Agents Lose Control
Autonomous agents increasingly perform long-horizon tasks involving tool use, persistent state, and consequential actions, raising a fundamental question: \emph{under what conditions does an agent cross the boundary of authorized execution while pursuing a legitimate task?} Existing studies often at
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Analyse automatique de traces d'activité utilisateurs pour la testabilité et l'amélioration continue de systèmes logiciels complexes par systèmes multi-agents adaptatifs#377959
- Some[Body] Must Receive That Pain for Agent Accountability#693410
- When the Environment Becomes the Interface: Multisensory Environmental Interfaces for Human-AI Interaction in Autonomous Vehicles#1116935
- Spawn Freely, Act Sparingly: Progressive Risk Vesting for Recursive LLM-Agent Trees#821023
- Explore, Execute, Evolve: A Skill Acquisition and Reuse Loop for Embodied Agents#1142118
Record · ID 1084414
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive