arXiv (OAI Expanded)
open access
When does a scaling result justify a different allocation? A critical review of resource-allocation evidence for AI systems
AI scaling studies increasingly evaluate systems that combine a pretrained model with retrieval, search, verification, tools, and interaction. Yet a higher score under a larger budget does not by itself show where additional resources are best spent. This critical integrative review asks when a repo
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- When the Score Becomes the Target: Rethinking Metric Validity in Autonomous Driving#1128710
- Excess capacity and representational sharing: A lesson from computational accounts of cognitive control#691277
- Models That Know How Evaluations Are Designed Score Safer#984168
- Task Architecture and Learning from Coarse Performance#1154945
- AI Survival Stories: Responses to Critics#87637
Record · ID 1084447
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive