arXiv (OAI Expanded)
open access
Building Legal Reward Models for Grounding and Abstention
Large language models are increasingly used in high-stakes domains such as law, where systems must ground their reasoning in retrieved evidence and abstain when that evidence is insufficient. However, existing reward models are largely optimised for general preferences rather than contextual groundi
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- LexReward: A Taxonomy-Driven Reward Framework for Legal Language Models#1144038
- Code-as-Auditor: Executable Compliance Reasoning via Regulation-to-Code#1013799
- Code-as-Auditor: Executable Compliance Reasoning via Regulation-to-Code#978500
- BenGER: Benchmarking LLM Systems on Subsumption-Based Legal Reasoning in German Law#800042
- Moral Disagreement and the Limits of AI Value Alignment: a dual challenge of epistemic justification and political legitimacy#113449
Record · ID 1084664
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive