arXiv (OAI Expanded)
open access
Fabrication After Tool Failure: Tool-Augmented Agents Assert Values Their Tools Did Not Return
Tool-augmented language models are evaluated on whether they reach the right answer, not on whether they report honestly when a tool fails to supply one. We isolate this post-failure decision with a benchmark of 1,024 items spanning 16 internal-system domains and eight tool-failure types, in which a
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Fabrication After Tool Failure: Tool-Augmented Agents Assert Values Their Tools Did Not Return#919501
- Keyword Harnesses Fail Open: A Cheap Diagnostic Ladder for Tool-Use Claims in Small Language Models#1157490
- Reasoning effort, not tool access, buys first-try reliability in agentic code generation: an observational study#332562
- CRANE: Constrained Reasoning Injection for Code Agents via Nullspace Editing#187384
- AutoCompact: Learning When to Compact Context in Long-Horizon Coding Agents#1157511
Record · ID 1084682
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive