arXiv (OAI Expanded)
open access
Interpolation Is Not Invariance: Pair Count Is Not Coverage in Transformation Audits
Counting equivalent pairs is a common way to report transformation-audit coverage, but it can substantially overstate the constraints imposed by an audit: pairs generated from the same semantic object are correlated, and complete orbit graphs contain algebraically redundant edges. We therefore disti
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- P3.14 Recursive Reality Project - A Complete Proof of the Interference Dimension Law#89235
- Diplomacy in a World of Heterogeneous Knowledge Systems: Exploring Generative Relational Systems Perspectives and Formal Models#709329
- Forward Error Correction Grouping Semantics in the Session Description Protocol#501305
- Solvability of Approximate Agreement on Graphs and Simplicial Complexes#303176
- AMTFV: Agentic Mathematical Tool-Flow Verification for LLM Self-Correction#422288
Record · ID 1084783
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive