ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Pilot Trial: Comparison of Flow Patterns
The purpose of this study is to determine why sutureless aortic bioprostheses apparently offer better haemodynamic properties compared to sewed-in aortic bioprostheses in patients who underwent aortic valve replacement. Our approach to address this question is the combination of clinical data with the application of specifically validated experimental and computer based analyses to compare the performance of these valves under patient-specific conditions.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versu Surgical Aortix Valve Replacement for Treating Elderly Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis and Small Aortic Annuli: A Prospective Randomized Study The VIVA Trial#992676
- Clinical Trial Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Artificial Polymer Heart Valve for the Treatment of Aortic Valve Disease#916614
- Biological Factors Associated With Subclinical Valvular Thrombosis#807098
- Hemodynamic Performance in Stentless Heart Valves#916896
- Safety and Efficacy of the Symetis ACURATE Neo/TF Compared to the Edwards SAPIEN 3 Bioprosthesis.#1087481
Record · ID 1086489
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive