ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Modern Methods of Treatment and Diagnosis of Patients With Injuries and Diseases of the Musculoskeletal System
arthroplastybone-regenerationfractureskneeknee-osteoarthritisosteoarthritisreplacementtotal-knee-arthroplasty
Brief Summary This clinical study investigates the safety and effectiveness of combining advanced regenerative therapies with personalized surgical technology for patients with delayed fracture healing (non-unions), knee osteoarthritis, and those requiring total knee replacement. Scientific rationale Bone fractures sometimes heal slowly or fail to unite despite standard treatment, and knee osteoarthritis causes progressive cartilage loss, pain, and disability. Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) are multipotent cells with well-documented ability to promote bone formation, modulate inflammation, and support tissue repair. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP), prepared from the patient's own blood, delivers concentrated growth factors that accelerate healing and reduce inflammation. Both therapies are supported by multiple clinical studies showing their potential to improve fracture union rates and relieve osteoarthritis symptoms. For patients undergoing knee replacement, the study uses patient-specific 3D-printed surgical instruments (cutting guides) created from the individual's CT or MRI scans. These custom tools have been shown in scientific literature to improve implant positioning accuracy compared with conventional methods. Safety All three technologies have favorable safety profiles. MSCs and PRP are autologous (derived from the patient), which greatly reduces the risk of immune reactions or disease transmission. Clinical trials have reported no serious treatment-related adverse events, such as tumor formation or systemic complications, with these regenerative approaches. The 3D-printed instruments are biocompatible and designed specifically for each patient, with studies confirming they do not increase perioperative risks. Study procedures (high-level overview) Participants with delayed fracture healing receive a single minimally invasive injection of MSCs combined with PRP directly at the fracture site under local anesthesia or light sedation. Patients with knee osteo
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Immuno-based Profiling of knEe OA Patients to Predict reSponse to Regenerative Treatment#879071
- Study of Platelet-rich Plasma in Treating Patients With Tibiofemoral Cartilage Degeneration#890076
- Effects of α MAT Versus Steroid Injection in Knee Osteoarthritis (STα MAT-knee Study)#909624
- High Frequency Intensive Autologous PRP Injection and Genicular Nerve Blocks in Treating Knee Osteoarthritis#832665
- Synovium Brushing to Augmented Microfracture for Improved Cartilage Repair#858721
Record · ID 1087262
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive