ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Periarticular Infiltration of Local Anesthetics Versus Pericapsular Nerve Group Block for Total Hip Replacement
This randomized trial is set out to compare the postoperative strength preservation capacity of local infiltration anesthesia (LIA) and pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block after performing a primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). The hypothesis is that LIA represents a superior alternative to PENG block in terms of strength preservation but providing effective analgesia during the first 24 postoperative hours after THA. Hence, the trial was designed as a superiority study hypothesizing a fivefold reduction in quadriceps paresis/paralysis at 3 hours.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- PENG Block With Two Diffirent Volume#826452
- Quality Of Recovery After Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block For Hip Hemiarthroplasty Under Spinal Anesthesia#1125901
- Comparıson Of PENG Block wıth Intra-articular And Quadratus Lumborum Block İn Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty#849245
- Perioperative Analgesia for Total Hip Arthroplasty#876962
- Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) Lumbar Plexus Verses Periarticular#857707
Record · ID 1087463
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive