ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Ethyl Chloride Versus 5% Lidocaine for Topical Anesthesia of Oral Mucosa
Local anesthesia in the oral cavity is a pain full experience for the patient. All means should be made to reduce the pain and anxiety of the patient for needle stick procedures. My study aims in elevating the pain experienced by the patient during this procedure by using either cold application with ethyl chloride or 5% lidocaine gel.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- A Study of the Use of Microneedle Patches to Deliver Topical Lidocaine in the Oral Cavity#893412
- A Comparsion Between Articaine Hydrochloride and Buffered Lidocaine Hydrochloride in the Context of Maxillary Permanent Teeth Extraction Using the Buccal Infiltration Technique Only(Clinical Study).#910913
- Lidocaine Spray Compared With Submucosal Injection During LEEP: a Randomized Controlled Trial#1137423
- Percocet vs. Bupivicaine for Toothaches in the ED#829410
- The Effect of Buccal Infiltration Administration of Clonidine on the Success Rate of Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block#1152737
Record · ID 1087617
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive