ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Randomized Clinical Study Comparing Two Guided Surgery Techniques for Free-end Implant Placement
This is a randomized multicenter clinical study that compares two static guided surgery techniques in free-end partial edentulism. The aim is to compare the accuracy obtained between dento-osseous supported and dento-mucosal supported surgical splints to place dental implants in posterior osseous ridges.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Evaluation of Immediate Implant Placement Using Dual Zone Approach Versus Connective Tissue Graft#1073238
- Evaluation of the Prevalence Rate and Related Risk Factors of Ridge Preservation#900435
- Supracrestal Tissue Attachment Dimensions & Peri-implant Health#876812
- Bone Quality and Quantity Following Guided Bone Regeneration#871814
- Early Dental Implant Installation in Regeneration Sites: a Prof of Concept Prospective Case Study#1032612
Record · ID 1087712
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive