ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparative Study Between Two Fecal Management Systems
The purpose of the study is to determine the prevalence of anal erosions within a 14 day period among adult ICU patients at Cleveland Clinic Main Campus who receive one of two fecal management systems (FMS). Null Hypothesis: There is no difference in the rates of anal erosion between the twp fecal management systems in a 14 day period. Alternative Hypothesis: One fecal management system is no worse than the second fecal management system in the development of anal erosion.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Investigation of the Incidence of Caries in Pits and Fissures Sealed With Bioactive Sealant Compared to Fluoride Releasing Resin Based Pit and Fissure Sealant#810189
- Risk Factors for Distal Caries of Second Molars Adjacent to Mandibular Impacted Third Molars#992379
- Registry and Biorepository for IBD in Central Texas#1112816
- An Examination of the Effect on Various Factors of Bed Baths Applied by Two Different Methods in Intensive Care Patients#804898
- Study of the Prevalence of Polymyositis and Dermatomyositis in Normandy#859195
Record · ID 1089227
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive