eScholarship
metadata only
Falsificationism – the incomplete story about choosing good experiments
Falsificationism remains a popular framework considered by many scientists as 'the normatively correct model of science', and of human cognition as a kind of 'lay science'. In this paper, we demonstrate some fundamental conceptual shortcomings and gaps in this normative prescription. While some of
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Falsification of theories without verification of basic statements – an argument for the possibility of knowledge growth#751851
- Scientific Rationality as Normative System#702569
- Norms in Actual Causation#91522
- Information and Inaccuracy#763532
- El sentido lógico de la refutabilidad#115883
Record · ID 1089882
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive