CanLII
metadata only
Mendioro v. Canada (Attorney General)
Decided: 2026-09-23. Docket: A-178-25. Citation: 2026 FCA 159 (CanLII). Administrative law — Judicial review — Reasonableness — Social Security Tribunal, Appeal Division decision under review — Whether decision ordering repayment of EI-ERB was reasonable — Court may intervene only if decision not reasonable — Analysis of amount of debt not unreasonable — Application dismissed | Pensions and social benefits — Employment Insurance Emergency Response Benefits — Repayment — Whether claimant must repay EI-ERB received without entitlement — Repayment ordered by Commission and upheld by SST-AD — Applicant did not contest calculations leading to amount owing — Judicial review dismissed, no costs | Limitation periods — Reconsideration — Employment Insurance Act — Whether Commission waited too long
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- R v Haddad#1146889
- 11 U.S.C. § 1165 — Protection of the public interest#563112
- Meneen v. Tallcree First Nation#1079785
- A tutela judicial de urgência da suspensão da exigibilidade do crédito tributário indevido#947302
- Khalil v. Canada (Attorney General)#1120799
Record · ID 1090886
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive