Acheson v St Albert (City)

canada, canadian, case law, court opinion, canlii, abca, 2026abca304, 2026 abca 304 (canlii), 2026, abca, 304, (canlii), 2603-0124ac, 2026, municipalities, land use planning, development permits, discretionary use “religious assembly” in bp2 district, appeal from subdivision and development appeal board decision under municipal government act, s. 688, statutory plans and neighbourhood compatibility raised, questions of law identified as arguable, permission to appeal granted in part, municipalities, statutory plans, area structure plan and municipal development plan, can the sdab expressly disregard applicable statutory plans as “out of date”, whether mdp silence on religious assemblies supports finding of consistency, sdab duty to consider compliance with plans, grounds warrant review by a panel, permission to appeal granted, statutory interpretation, municipal government act, sections 687(3) and 688(3), whether the sdab was required to identify and interpret applicable provisions of mdp, asp and lub, whether the proposed development complied with them, rossdale community league (1974) v edmonton (subdivision and development appeal board) raised, questions of law arguable, permission to appeal granted, procedure, appeals, permission to appeal, whether capacity and parking concerns raise a question of law under municipal government act, s. 688(3), no appeal for errors of fact or treatment of evidence, mohr v strathcona (county) applied, sufficiency of reasons not standalone, stubicar v calgary (subdivision and development appeal board) cited, permission to appeal refused on capacity ground