PsyArXiv
metadata only
Beyond Rules of Thumb: Empirical Sample Size Requirements for Detecting Institutional Effects in the context of Therapist Effects
Objective: Multilevel modelling of therapist effects (TE) and institutional effects (IE) is standard in psychotherapy research, yet empirical sample-size guidance is scarce for TE and virtually absent for IE. Existing recommendations rely on rules of thumb from two-level designs that vary widely acr
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Beyond Rules of Thumb: Empirical Sample Size Requirements for Detecting Institutional Effects in the context of Therapist Effects#1092121
- Short- and Long-term Group Psychotherapy#913076
- Blended Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy With Compassion#1163224
- A scoping review of counselling and psychological intervention models in low income nations.#25450
- Postpandemic Use of Video-Based Psychotherapy Among German Outpatient Psychotherapists: Repeated Cross-Sectional and Partially Longitudinal Survey Study.#420851
Record · ID 1092165
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive