SocArXiv
metadata only
Ideology on the U.S. District Courts: Reexamining Presidential and Senatorial Appointment Power
Unlike U.S. appellate courts, scholars of the American federal judiciary typically lack ideological estimates for district court judges that are derived directly from their behavior. Rather, scholars have primarily relied upon proxy measures based upon the preferences of a judge's appointing presid
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Ideology on the U.S. District Courts: Reexamining Presidential and Senatorial Appointment Power#1092105
- Replication Data for: Inconsistency and Indecision in the United States Supreme Court#939613
- From Courtrooms to Ballots: A Social Ecological Analysis of Anti-Trans Judicial Outcomes on Legislation, Elections, and Trans Geographic Demography#154999
- Catharine MacKinnon May Not Be Enough: Legal Change and Religion in Catholic and Sunni Jurisprudence#1178147
- Implications of neuroscientific findings for jurisprudence#492801
Record · ID 1092537
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive