ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Partially Covered Versus Uncovered Pyloro-duodenal Stents for Unresectable Malignant Gastric Outlet Obstruction. A Double Blinded Randomised Controlled Trial.
To compare the efficacy of a novel partially covered (PC) versus uncovered (UC) pyloro-duodenal stents (DS) in unresectable malignant gastric outlet obstruction. We hypothesize that the use of PCDS could reduce the re-intervention rates when compared to UCDS.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Comparison of Duodenal Stenting vs Transpyloric and Duodenal Stenting for Malignant Obstruction#1086884
- EUS-GE vs ES for Palliation of Gastric Outlet Obstruction#1104100
- Gastric Plication in Mexican Patients#1151022
- Early Pancreatic Stent Placement for Preventing PEP#897821
- Gastric Peroral Endoscopic Tunneled Stricturotomy for Post‐Sleeve Gastrectomy Stenosis: Case Series and Literature Review#1053073
Record · ID 1093341
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive