ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
the MCCE vs EGD Trial
Anaemia is common in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and is associated with significant recurrent bleeding risk and major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE). Esophageal-gastro-Duodenoscopy (EGD) is commonly used as an initial investigation for anaemia but is often non-diagnostic. Magnetically Controlled Capsule Endoscopy (MCCE) being less invasive and with comparable diagnostic accuracy as EGD, might be used as an alternative initial investigation for anaemia in patients with ACS.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Women's IschemiA TRial to Reduce Events In Non-ObstRuctive CAD#863603
- How Institutional Guidelines for Urgent Inpatient Surgeries Affect Intensity of Perioperative Cardiovascular Testing#1128180
- Recognition and Treatment of Dysglycemia. AGS - Acute Glucose Service#840815
- Clinician factors influencing decision-making in emergency general surgery (EGS): a scoping review protocol.#25486
- IT Health Checks — NS&I — Layer 7 Limited#608212
Record · ID 1093627
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive