PhilArchive
open access
AI language models cannot replace human research participants
In a recent letter, Dillion et. al (2023) make various suggestions regarding the idea of artificially intelligent systems, such as large language models, replacing human subjects in empirical moral psychology. We argue that human subjects are in various ways indispensable.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Artificial moral agents are infeasible with foreseeable technologies#739865
- Voices of Freelance Professional Writers on AI: Limitations, Expectations, and Fears#1142534
- Legal and Ethical Challenges of Large Language Models: An Analysis Under the GDPR and the AI Act#1177510
- Legal and Ethical Challenges of Large Language Models: An Analysis Under the GDPR and the AI Act#1177497
- Artificial Intelligence and Law – An Overview of Recent Technological Changes in Large Language Models and Law#1176711
Record · ID 109379
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive