ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparison Between Two Tissue Acquisition Techniques by Endoscopic Ultrasound. (EUS)
There are various techniques to obtain tissue samples by using fine needle guided by endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). These techniques attempt to obtain the most adequate material with the best quantity and quality for analysis. Currently studies that compare the results concerning capillary technique versus wet technique are not available. In this sense, the authors consider necessary to explore both techniques documenting the results that can define which could be the best method so that it can routinely be used in cases of digestive neoplasia.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Ultrasound Guided Internal Jugular Vein Cannulation Using Biplanar Imaging: A Pilot Study#1102278
- EUS GUIDED Transduodenal Biopsy Using the 19G Flex#841613
- Study Of Ultrasound Windows For Measuring Inferior Vena Cava Changes Before Cardiac Surgery#1103513
- Comparison of 19g FNA and 19g FNB Needles for EUS-LB#1007481
- Flexible Endoscopy Biopsies for Submucous Tumors With a New Drill Instrument#832543
Record · ID 1094522
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive