ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Ergonomics of Laparoscopy: Robotic Camera Controlled Versus Human Camera Controlled
Minimal invasive surgery has acquired increased importance and the number of procedures performed is ever growing. Laparoscopic surgery has several distinct key benefits for patients over open surgery and therefore it is considered as standard treatment for most general surgery procedures. These benefits include faster recovery, shorter hospital stay, reduced post-operative pain and improved cosmetic results. However, laparoscopy has an increased burden to surgeons and many surgeons experience fatigue and physical discomforts due to laparoscopy. Robotic systems have been developed to improve the ergonomics (among other things), with good results. Many of the laparoscopy disadvantages have been overcome by robotic assisted surgery, such as increased range of motion, correction of the inverted instruments, and elimination of tremors.(4) Moreover, visualization of the operation is improved by personal camera control and stabilization of the image. The AutoLap system, a video analytic robotic camera holder, has been developed to hold the camera in a stable manner. It enables the surgeon to control the camera and eliminates the need for coordination and communication between surgeon and assistants. This study aims to evaluate the ergonomics of the surgeon and assistant during laparoscopy with the aid of the AutoLap system and compare it to standard laparoscopy. Also, it will be assessed whether the AutoLap can reduce physical and mental discomfort of both the surgeon and the assistant. Objective This multicenter randomized controlled trial aims to compare ergonomics of the OR nurse and the surgeon during standard laparoscopic procedures with laparoscopic procedures aided by a robotic camera holder, the AutoLap system. Study design Prospective, interventional, open, multicenter randomized controlled trial. The study will be conducted in Wilhemina Hospital Assen and in Meander Medical Center Amersfoort. Study population Adults ≥18 years who are scheduled for the fol
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Effect of Position and Pneumoperitoneum on Respiratory Mechanics and Transpulmonary Pressure During Laparoscopic Surgery#888657
- The IDEAL framework for surgical robotics: development, comparative evaluation and long-term monitoring.#171898
- Study of the Relationship Between Curarization and Pneumoperitoneum in Laparoscopic Surgery#888273
- Effectiveness Analysis of Armeo Spring Device as a Rehabilitation Treatment in Spinal Cord Injured Patients#812176
- Influence of visual delay on minute pointing and push down by upper limb assuming telesurgery application#124942
Record · ID 1094586
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive