ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparison of Two Biological Aortic Valves. Mosaic Ultra and Trifecta.
Comparing two biological valves in a prospective randomized study. Mosaic Ultra and Trifecta. The investigators are looking at EOA and the Pressure Gradients over the valve by patients with the same annulus measured by a hegar dilatator.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- TRIcvalve biCAVal Valve System for Severe Tricuspid Regurgitation (TRICAV-I)#804098
- Dedicated versus non-dedicated transcatheter valves for pure native aortic regurgitation: a single-centre experience#233622
- TRanscAtheter TreatMent of PurE Aortic Regurgitation With VitaFlow Liberty System#906037
- Safety and Efficacy of the Symetis ACURATE Neo/TF Compared to the Edwards SAPIEN 3 Bioprosthesis.#1087481
- REPRISE EDGE 29 mm EU Study#886348
Record · ID 1094807
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive