ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparison of Efficacy of Bupivacaine in Supraclavicular Block With or Without Dexmedetomidine
End-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients are coming for Brachial vein transposition surgery. Patients were randomly allocated using sealed opaque envelope bearing A- (Injection bupivacaine (0.25%) 28 ml plus 2 ml. normal saline) and B-Injection bupivacaine (0.25%) 28 mL plus dexmedetomidine I ug/kg diluted to 2 ml). Supraclavicular block under ultrasound and nerve stimulator guidance was performed.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Intrathecal Bupivacaine Versus Bupivacaine and Clonidine in Paediatrics Age Group:A Comparative Evaluation#811999
- Effectiveness of Ultrasound (US) Guided Supraclavicular Block#900351
- The Minimum Effective Volume of Ropivacaine in Ultrasound-guided Supraclavicular Block#914562
- Ultrasound Guided Supraclavicular Nerve Block#1094852
- Effect of Dexmedetomidine As Adjuvant to Ropivacaine for Brachial Plexus Block#875011
Record · ID 1095253
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive