ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Laparoscopic Versus Open Incisional Hernia Repair
Primary closure of incisional hernia without the use of a mesh shows recurrence rates of up to 54%. If a mesh is used, the defect can be closed tension-free. Using this method, recurrence rates have been reduced to 8-21%. Laparoscopic correction of incisional hernia is a relatively new technique in which the mesh is positioned intraperitoneally. Research has shown that this procedure is technical feasible and may have benefits for the patients. The ongoing debate about the merits of endoscopic versus open incisional hernia repair prompts the need for a level 1 randomized controlled trial.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Open Mesh Versus Suture Repair in Treatment of Abdominal Wall Hernias#1075748
- Endoscopic Mini/Less Open Sublay(EMILOS) Repair#813770
- Intraperitoneal Mesh With 3cm Overlap Versus a Rives-Stoppa Repair With a 6cm Overlap in Hernia Umbilicalis#979497
- A Prospective, Multicenter All Comers Study of Phasix Mesh for Ventral or Incisional Hernia Repair#840650
- Experience of IPOM Technique in Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair#829251
Record · ID 1095270
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive