ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparison of Customized and Standard Total Ankle Prostheses
The objective of this study is to compare primary total ankle replacement (TAR) performed with a customized procedure (prostheses customized for each patient based on his or her ankle morphology reconstructed from tomographic scans, and implanted via cutting guides customized for the patient) with standard primary TARs, considering: objective radiological results, subjective patient outcomes, and overall costs of both procedures
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Knee Arthroplasty Performed With Conventional and Customized Instrumentation#1161817
- Clinical Outcome and OR Resource Use of Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Patient-Specific or Conventional Instrumentation#862094
- Shoes size can predict implant sizes for primary total knee arthroplasty in a quick, reliable and costless manner#129374
- Application of Radiostereometric Analysis (RSA) to Triathlon Knee Components Inserted Using the OtisMed Custom-fit Total Knee Replacement System#801588
- Clinical Outcomes and Cost-effectiveness Analysis of ShapeMatch Technology#1101759
Record · ID 1095271
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive