ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Eyelash Prostheses Compared to 5.0% Lifitegrast BID for Dry Eye Disease.
This is a single-center, randomized, controlled trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of eyelash prostheses versus 5.0% Lifitegrast BID, in 40 patients (20 randomized to each of two arms of the study) evaluated at 3 weeks and 5 weeks, respectively, after initiation of treatment.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Use of Prophylactic Lubricating Drops After Cataract Surgery#1174231
- Efficacy and Safety Study of ATs in Patients With Dry Eye Syndrome#848613
- Eyelid Androgen Treatment in Dry Eye#1074790
- Tears Substitutions and Their Effects on Higher Order Aberrometery#982163
- Impact of Tixel Treatment on Symptoms and Signs in Patients With Dry Eye Disease#893686
Record · ID 1095506
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive